It seems Orly Taitz cannot file an honest "sworn" declaration "under penalty of perjury." Taitz most recent filing in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Santa Ana may very well result in her being charged criminally with perjury if Judge Carter or the U.S. Attorney decide to hold her to her words "under penalty of perjury."
Below is a section from Taitz' pleading that she has posted on the internet:
7. During the hearing I tried to protest this defamatory allegation against me and asked to speak. However, Judge Carter refused to let me speak and respond to this allegation.
8. In the same order on page 29, Judge Carter has stated that he received letters with affidavits, claiming that I asked potential witnesses to perjure themselves.
9. I declare that this is absolutely and categorically not true, and it constitutes an outrageous defamatory and slanderous accusation. Those letters were ex parte communications, highly prejudicial against me and my clients and I had no opportunity to respond and deny those accusations.
10. I believe that the court referred to the letters from Larry Sinclair and Lucas Smith. Both parties were contacted and asked to be witnesses during the motion hearing on September 8, 2009.
11. I have asked Larry Sinclair to authenticate an affidavit he submitted to the Chicago police regarding the homicide of Mr. Donald Young. In fact, the statements to which Mr. Sinclair would testify are already a matter of public record.
1. In the affidavit submitted to the Chicago Police and in his book, recently published, Mr. Sinclair stated that Mr. Donald Young contacted him repeatedly and told Mr. Sinclair that he had a lengthy homosexual relationship with Mr. Obama.
2. The affidavit further said that Mr. Young was found dead, shot in the back of his head at the onset of the Democratic primaries for 2008 presidential election.
3. Any allegation that I asked Mr. Sinclair to perjure himself is not only completely defamatory, but lacks any sense or reason, as Mr. Sinclair’s affidavit regarding Mr. Young’s homicide can be found filed with the Chicago police department and in his book, that can be purchased on the Internet.
According to Orly Taitz above declaration she has in fact committed perjury in the declaration itself. To wit:
1. Orly Taitz claims in paragraph 9 that she never had the opportunity to respond to and deny the statements of my SWORN affidavit. Mrs. Taitz claimed in a previous post following Judge Carters ruling on October 29, 2009 that she never had the opportunity to "read" or respond to said affidavit. Ms. Taitz was served a copy of the affidavit by U.S. First Class mail, postage pre-paid after three days of attempting to serve her by fax failed. Gary Kreep, Counsel for Plaintiffs Drake & Robinson, and the U.S. Attorney were served by fax the very day said affidavit was placed in the U.S. Mail to the Clerk of the Court.
Orly Taitz claims she did not have an opportunity to respond to said affidavit, yet she responded to it on her web site as well as in interviews with the OC newspaper. Orly Taitz made the decision not to respond to the affidavit with the court because she had told her supporters no such affidavit had been filed with the court.
Mrs. Taitz claims of Ex Parte Communication between me and Judge Donald O. Carter are also without merit. I did not write any "letter(s)" of any kind to the Court or to Judge Carter. I filed the single affidavit, which I stand by, with the Court because Orly Taitz requested I go into Judge Carters Court and give false testimony.
2. Orly Taitz has perjured herself in her declaration in paragraph 11, sub-paragraph 2, were she states "The affidavit further said that Mr. Young was found dead, shot in the back of his head at the onset of the Democratic primaries for 2008 presidential election," considering the fact that nowhere in my affidavit to the Chicago Police Department does it say anything about Donald Young being found "shot in the back of the head..."
This is exactly what Orly Taitz was asking me to do, go into Judge Carter's Court and make statements that are not part of my affidavit to the Chicago Police nor in my book.
Orly Taitz continues to try to make the murder of Donald Young a part of a case challenging the eligibility of Barack Obama, that has nothing to do with Orly Taitz convoluted claims. She continues to make statements that are not true about me and what I have stated in sworn affidavits.
Orly Taitz might want to read the affidavit and/or my Book before she swears out another declaration under penalty of perjury.
